首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of methods for estimating gentamicin clearance and retrospective analysis of changes in clearance with emphasis on patients with normal renal function.
【2h】

Comparison of methods for estimating gentamicin clearance and retrospective analysis of changes in clearance with emphasis on patients with normal renal function.

机译:比较庆大霉素清除率的方法比较和清除率变化的回顾性分析,重点是肾功能正常的患者。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The subjects were 29 general medical and surgical patients with apparently normal renal function at the start of treatment with gentamicin. Nine methods of estimating gentamicin clearance (CL) were compared as means of calculating gentamicin dosage. In 23 of the 29 patients CL was measured twice during treatment. The first measurement was based on 10 blood samples taken around a dose early in treatment. CL calculated from the area under the serum concentration-time curve using all 10 samples was designated a reference method for comparison with other methods. There was considerable inter-individual variation in CL. Serum creatinine and body weight gave poor estimates of an individual's CL. A good estimate of CL was obtained from four blood samples taken immediately before and 2, 3 and 4 h after dosing. Prediction of serum levels is not a good method for checking CL estimations. A significant decrease in CL was found during treatment. This was probably due to a reduction in glomerular filtration rate.
机译:受试者为29名在庆大霉素治疗开始时肾功能明显正常的普通内科和外科患者。比较了估算庆大霉素清除率(CL)的9种方法,作为计算庆大霉素剂量的手段。在29例患者中,有23例在治疗过程中两次检测到CL。首次测量基于在治疗早期某个剂量附近采集的10个血液样本。使用所有10个样品从血清浓度-时间曲线下面积计算出的CL称为参考方法,可与其他方法进行比较。 CL之间存在很大的个体差异。血清肌酐和体重不能很好地估计一个人的CL。从服药前,服药后2、3和4 h采集的四份血液样本可以很好地估计CL。血清水平的预测不是检查CL评估的好方法。发现在治疗期间CL显着降低。这可能是由于肾小球滤过率降低所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号